NEW ORDER AMERICA

From the Reassertion of the Real to the Only Global Grand Strategy

I see a ship in the harbor.

To think, not long ago, the entire World was ours.

A crisis of vision exists, both within and beyond the state: America, Russia and Europe drifting apart as they lose sense of themselves. A runaway train with no engineer in sight, these states have become blind, their people asleep, their powers alien, delusional or insane. Everything and everyone is broken into different shattered pieces without the slightest unity - and they are supposed to accomplish anything great? No collective being can exist without singular form, requisite a common substance: the more homogeneous of the great the more historically potent. Without concrete order and orientation there is no possibility to see beyond tomorrow, for how can the ahistoric behave historically? All conception and perception falls to a metaphysically flattened mere here and now. Beyond the amity lines, they in their antipathetically poised nomothesis, aren’t captured. Sure they are subject to the same neutralizing technicity, but not a hostile fifth column which leverages this phenomenon against them, nevermind a state of complete cultural degeneration. They still have an awareness of their being and thus a potential for further becoming. In this, they have all of the necessary things prerequisite to historical vision. Without the same, how could we ever spiritually compete? Stuck in a world of idealistic notions, bourgeois preferences and parochial interest-calculation, we will be outmaneuvered by those on multi-generational timelines. No particular policy area or political office will fix this. It is everything or it is nothing. A total reassertion of the European spirit, or complete annihilation in this World - forever.

The destiny of all Europeans is found in the destiny of the American, of America. We are the most forward marching people, those of us settler-Europeans still left. For better or worse we will remain the strongest particular-people historically and strongest power physically. Geographically we are poised to dominate an entire new continent, insulated from telluric frontier concerns of our European brothers across the Atlantic. For our frontiers are endless ocean and outer space above. We are geographically poised to regulate the entire world from afar whereas they are stuck in immediate security concerns from Asia and Africa. We are a mothership for the world, and they are a fortress for our people.

The current unraveling of global order and the current internal disintegrations within European nations across the ‘West’ are of the same root: the religious, then cultural, then social and now racial collapse of an entire civilization. To not identify this fundamentally – a process centuries in the making – offering only milquetoast explanations or normative solutions, is to only instill wastes of time and conceptual schizophrenia. The general confusion around fundamental questions of national ontology and teleology have only helped to produce a mass-hysteria for the public. It serves as no helpful reference for what is real.

If America as a state remains deracinated from its origins and broader identitarian unity with European nations, and if Europe remains caught in a whirl of conflicting interests ultimately pinned on their justified ambivalence towards America, all European nations will suffer a cataclysmic disunity. This will translate into our states growing apart as our nations internally disintegrate and our outward power declines. The rising powers of the East – Israel, India and China – along with intermediate powers – Iran, Japan, South Korea, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Brazil, Pakistan, Vietnam – and the remaining non-white peoples, will work to foster the disunity of the European peoples for it benefits their own collective position. The Russians to their own historical dis-benefit are already pulled into this. Ethnically European powers will find themselves on opposing ends of coalitions they consider merely interest-based whereas in reality they are representative of an existential counter-order for those non-Europeans. Their higher historical agency will give them positional advantage over the ensuing century. As Russia sides with the heartland-Asian powers, Europe brokers dealings with the Chinese delusionally believing they have found their own way and America seeks ephemeral friends anywhere and everywhere through financial bribery and ideological platitude. The true political basis for all of our peoples is the simplest: our race. It and its exponents are what feed our internal political vitality and bond us with each other beyond our national boundaries. The longer this is ignored officially the faster we will all collectively submerge amongst the massive population influxes and power-political wit of alien peoples and powers who know this, be it intuitively or rationally, to and for their own benefit.

We are in the position to regulate the entire World, not as some isolated fortress, but as the one central mothership for the Earth. Europe is that fortress, and beyond our shared heartland are our fading bridgeheads. We still have time, but we must have complete change of regime both here and there to allow such a political reassertion. This is a political question, not a theoretical or technocratic one. The full will of the people, their realization as one greater historical object, is what is required for us to either continue or fall into historical entropy. A full transvaluation of all mass-cultural attachments of today are required; an awareness that our technological-system-states are post-political technocracies and not reflective in any way of our being, is more than warranted. We are in a total age and if we do not embrace our struggle totally we will be consumed not simply by our enemies, but first and foremost by this anti-spirit that has plagued us at growing pace for centuries. It is likewise a spiritual question as well.

Without America, Europe will be out-competed, squished and crushed between the now far outpaced industrial sophistication beyond it, to east and to west, the scale of masses to their South. Without Europe, America will have no historical reference and no source of inspiration for their cultural revitalization. Unlike the Continental-European nations, America is still one in early ethnogenesis, but without reference to formal kin this fermentation will not be mature. We all need each other, all of us White Europeans, for not we will all perish together.

America destroyed the old European nomos, it will take America to restore it. For all of the old continent’s grandeur and rank, only America can take this first small step for man. Those stripes dark red and bright white, they stretch left and right. Across a whole continent, stationed around whole world, even posted above in the outer – as if to symbolize our span.

Our Historical Trinity in Being, Becoming and Absolution.

“Faith is worth anything only as long as it conquers.”

LEON DEGRELLE

A complete grand-strategy is a total one. Anything short of this is a half-measure, a thing in which failure is the built-in outcome. It is unserious for the great power or civilization to pursue, and all the more tragic for those with the actual chance to actualize something far greater. Ultimately, and perhaps polemically, this is the only good grand strategy is therefore global.

No ideal or manifestation of spirit is strong enough to conquer if its spring-source has dried. All passion, over time, only finds its consistency in what is objectively, elementally, true. For our civilization's offensive spirit to be fundamentally maintained, those things must be safeguarded. Nothing short of a complete restoration of that which is our existence, our inward collective form, will allot the total outward spirit we have to have in order to succeed globally. Therefore, from the very beginning, all outwardly aggressive attitudes that ignore or only offer partial measure to solve our internal dissolutions, must be seen with skepticism. Until we "have something to defend" we will have "nothing to seek."

The European people were, and are, and forever will be the only broader folk capable of global unification. Every other distinct people in a potentially competitive position is too limited in power and position to accomplish more than regional consolidation. The entirety of the Northern Hemisphere with the exception of the Far-East is heartland-European, colonial-incorporated, or subordinated. The most prosperous places in South America, Africa and of course Australia are European outposts. The remainder of the Southern Hemisphere, in many ways even still, are European holdings. Although of course this is disintegrating, and has been since the World Wars.

The distinction between Europeans Old and New is first one of geography, before even history. For the destiny is ultimately the same for the ontology is. We are the same people. Say it repeatedly that we are! One common mission of a greater-people who not only follow but are for all historical and spiritual purposes Christiana. That was the raison d'etre of out ships going west and south, travelers going East, and voyagers ever further North. For the evangelization of the Good. It is this identity principle, that between being and becoming, under a common eschatology, that is our completed existence. Our total existentiality. How superficial our flags become when considered as complete marks of enmity. Dividing forms against common substance. Are we really to pick straws between Dutchman and Norwegian so long as they harbor their respective telluric pasture? Peripherally this becomes a greater question, but still politically insignificant. American, English or Irish, German or Pole, Finn or Swede, French or Spanish, Italian or Greek, Hungarian or Romanian, Ukrainian, even Russian - we all occupy the same historicity. The same spirit. And any enmity within this group, in the current world-situation, is tantamount to civil war.

That distinction though, of those Europeans that remained and those who colonized, it has so horribly grown into a dispirited psychological breakdown be it in Canada, across America, in South Africa or Australia. In losing a sense of our why for being far from our ultimate home, we have lost a sense of our being itself. We lack culture, identity, for we have lost our reference to the Homeland, our Christianity, our civilizing mission, our colonialism. In foreign lands, before we have gone through the centuries required for 'Homelandization,' an offensive posture must be maintained. Lose this and we cave inwards: all European Peoples not in Europe.

Failure to return to our single religious orientation to the One True Christ, the global to even interplanetary capacity for us to culturally strive, a requirement for all great technology and struggle, is lost. For kultur is the spirit of the people, rasse their soul. Expansionary tendencies alone, typically justified by imperial fervor, is unsuitable to our sensibility and inherent morality. It must be within a moral to literal-spiritual cloak. Not simply to justify it, but to give it life in itself. This is where global-liberalism so clearly failed, appealing to our sensibilities but suffocating our drive. We aim to expand for the good of all, the greatness of our people, the honor of God, the future of the whole Earth and all humanity. A Spiritual Revolution ad infinitum, against self-grandiosity and power-narcissism. An order that can inspire genuine sacrifice, genuine struggle, genuine honor. But that must be upon the genuine first! Becoming becomes more important for the expanded-upon places, not yet home as the Continent is: those of us who reside here must live our becoming to make possible the continuation of our being. To spawn a continued, peripheral, expansive, genesis.

America is that principal colonial European People. Likewise it is thus the spearhead of Europe's global destiny. This conceptual distinction within our broader people, that between heartland and colonial peoples, reminds us that those in a colonial condition do not have the historical and cultural background of their predecessors, they are raw in the frontier. Eventually, colonials develop into a cultural-heartland of their own, and the heartland of Europe expands. This was occurring with European Russia, or earlier with the Germanic settlement of Scandinavia. Colonials must therefore remain in offensive posture, and their states must more overtly emphasize what otherwise is a truism. Especially in modernity, ideological and techno-economic distortions are all the more severe at the geographic precipice. However, it is here that is the frontline for our historical expansion, and thus the focus of energetic destiny. For the first heartland now is an antiquated museum, where historic forms are too obsidian. America, like Germany in the 19th century, still has youth and chaos amongst its Europeans. We like to look at this as a great problem, when it just as much is a great opportunity for something new to emerge in crystal. Secure being then safeguard a becoming.

A Complete Realism and a Total Politicism.

“Those whom the Gods wish to destroy they first make mad, and blind.”

The sophists of today lament anything total yet they themselves support a system of total spiritual neutralization. Absolute spirit is always preferable to absolute anti-spirit - if that is the choice. Radical something over nothing is today’s epistemic divide.

Any scientific realism that fails to take into account the forces which motivate man prior to his rationality is ludicrous if considered absolutely. This is all the more true when we consider that ‘the political’ is a phenomenon where rational theory is only coherent after it already is. Those things that become ‘political’ in the existential sense are noumenal to our thinking minds. Their rationality is not based on abstract hypothesized reason or ideals, they are just there – and therefore true.

The global-ambition and overtly racial assertion of Geopolitik, precisely the thing modern technical ‘geopolitical’ writers lament in it for creating ‘bias’ is actually the very objective ontological orientation that makes it a far more useful science than raw analysis. It is absurd to conduct genuine political science without a reference. Where it becomes a problem is when analysis is completely hijacked by preference, but not where sober judgement on sound presuppositions exist. That a common scientific awareness of the Europeans orientation as themselves and vis a vis the entire world began to develop in the 19^th and 20^th centuries is indicative of a self-aware and confident people. It is also demonstrative of the greater political distinction arising between the European peoples, diverse in their own right, and the alien groups beyond the frontiers. Suddenly even Anglo and Russian had far more in common, as imperial states but even as peoples.

The conclusion is clear: that the most elemental global-political object of orientation is racial, and that without orientation global grand strategy is foundationless. All motivating principles must be built on the most concrete basis to guide the most and for the longest. If there is to be complexity – artistic, intellectual, ‘cultural,’ – it is to be upon the elemental, not in spite of it. Anything more conceptually complex than this basic reality, that seeks to epistemically enfranchise itself in the same way, undermines the integrity of the prospective order. In it being de-ontological, it is de-orientational. Legitimate grounding can only come from the real, the landed, the racial.

To avoid absurdity and liberal-linguistic machinations. The position of the White Race globally must be established as the fundamental object of orientation for all White, historically or currently, European nations. If this first step is not achieved, there will be no room for diplomatic to internal-cultural innovations; no long run insurance for any great order to maintain. Only parochial formally national strategies.

All political, administrative, juridic, economic and social customs must exist in concrete orientation to the People as real. Only then is it appropriate for these domains to conditionally technicize into their own conceptual worlds, so long as it is for the benefit of the group, not its own internal logic apotheosized. It is completely true that historical, spiritual, and scientific realisms of human form cannot replace the immediate normative technics of various state-functional practices, particularly law and administration. What is advocated here is not a hyper-politicization of these spaces turning their content into something reductive, but rather a reassertion of the fundamentals. Where these inform the specific focus of these domains, they must be referenced absolutely; where ontological confusions arise the sophisticated realist sciences must self-assert; but where a question is merely legal, merely practical, functional, procedural or what be it, rationality and the science of such is of course a great achievement. The concern here, which is validated by the de-ontologization of the American and other European states, is the apotheosization of rational concepts which have resulted in decoupling from preunderstood ontological reality – to a world where it is illegal to formally recognize America as a European country; where it is shunned to appeal to such explicitly within the armed forces; where it is shunned in the political processes, the culture, the media, and where most academics who dominate the social and political sciences do not simply tow this line, but are enthusiastic about promoting uncritical anachronistic understandings of polity without any reference to fundamental forms of collective being from organic-community to race itself. That it even need to be controversially asserted that race is a central and real thing speaks to the absurdity our entire professional-institutional strata epistemically rests upon. All there is that is legitimate is rational-parochialities, technicism which was never supposed to become the auto-ontology of the state, and by bizarre modern-technological developments, bleed into being the perceived being of the national – peoples – identity, somehow. Yes, a simulacrum identity.

If the basis of the state is the identity of its people, and this identity is a representational derivative of technical processes and many suspended and organically-decoupled a priori theories, then the entire identity of the people and state is inauthentic. The implications this has on the state in all circumstances, normative or exceptional, is very poor. Without concrete orientation in the most authentic form, will at-large will deunify as its common understood form is realized to be illegitimate. Adults fall to their individual identities or various pluralistic niche sub-forms. Culture completely retreats from the entire population, civility recedes to an ever shrinking contingent of professionals. The art, expression, innovation, pedagogy, science, political-morale and industry of the nation shrinks and reduces to forms only supported by a technostructure that demands it, for itself. Ie a top-down incentive system keeps some things going in their reduced commodified forms, whereas formerly there was an organically oriented process of creation from a people that considered itself a people. Geniuses today are sent to rot in systems not teleologically oriented for the historical progress of their people, but for the parochially-technical mandate of their bureaucracy or company. Insofar as that of course occurred in a better past, it was within a context of general willing towards the higher, a willing which presupposed a unity of form. These individuals enrich themselves, credential themselves, and some rightfully go insane in an attempt to break the machine. The people at large suffers for they are divorced from unified orientation with them, from the great institutions now decoupled and from any and all innovation and productivity that remains. The state suffers to truly drive the people into the future for it, just like the people politically today (and hopefully this changes), are asleep. Call it schizophrenia, multiple-personality disorder, or simply point at the choma that preceded the Trump-era.

Thus, the objective of any legitimate political entity is to achieve a unified state of identity. This can only be accomplished, with the expectation of stability and full-employment-possibility, by coupling the state’s identity to the physical-spiritual identity of a real people. Politically speaking, this ‘identity’ will never be actually be achieved in the literal institutional-state itself as perfectly as it is in the individual human, domestic family, community or broader non-rational understanding of being sexual, racial or customatically ethnocultural; in the organic things pre-existing constructions. Nevertheless, this constructed state is what allows an organic people the historical power allotted by modern capacities, and thus they must pursue it. The closest a state can get to such a unification of identity amongst its members is by it encompassing the objective form of the People wholeheartedly, clearly delimiting what this means, as its first constitutional basis and active political form; not simply the latter, which comes sometimes in reactionary fits. The state must always be referential to something real to have substance, otherwise it depoliticizes and becomes mere mechanism. This is why even now it appeals to grossly inadequate identities to justify itself. The problem of course being that all of the many actual-identities currently within are inconsistent with each other, for they are simply respectively alien. So when the state religiously considers them all equal under an imagined civic identity only maintained through mass-medium propaganda, breakdown of the possibility for unified political will results. The official identity of this state, ideologically and mass-culturally based, is far far more superfluous and therefore weaker than an identity which is simply the already actual real – so long as this is both homogenous and of cultural quality, and for our passionate sake literally who we are and always will be. When the state can return to its pre-progressive capacity to appeal to the objective people, it will have a state identity of its own stronger than any other in its ontological fundamentals: an incoherent institutional strata with a strong real people is always superior to the inverse; America today is far more concerning than Poland in the 1990s. Once this unified identity is made explicit, where the real people and formal state may authentically adopt a common understanding, the energies of the people may feed that institution in full and the people may know they are embodied in full. Insofar as any risk exists to minorities, there is the Christianity and formal legal structure that shall mitigate political excesses; but if the existence of the people is under question, such concerns can never impede unless we desire an aimless people and a weak state.

Given that ours is the great power of the world, not only does the unification of our actual identity to that of the state bring us what any people of any sized state require naturally, but it brings the potential for both an exceptional tenacity for ourselves as a power, and the ability to appeal to our fraternal peoples, geopolitically, in full. It brings a potential for direction of currently incomprehensible temporal distance for our orientation will become correspondingly deep.

There is an illogical misnomer that if we adopt a posture of being an actual we that we therefore would alienate alien peoples abroad on the face of it. The truth is that we destroy our ability to absolutely appeal to our like peoples when we adopt absolutely universalistic political forms. That we could not adopt ethical and rational deliberations or diplomatic extensions to foreigners just because we happen to fully embrace our identity as the basis for our states and broader order is illogical liberal polemicist absurdity. We build such gestures upon a sound ontological base, not an imaged nothingness upon nice gestures. It is in this sense that this thesis is a ‘political realism’ whereby fundamentals take precedence over preferred norms in reality.

Unified Identity Within and Beyond the State as a World-Historical Imperative.

When a people is fully unified in their identity, and they have sovereignty over their states who ideally coalesce according to their identity broadly, a world-historical form appears. Such a thing allows clarity of general direction to ensue.

Prior to the ‘European Civil War’ was a long, gradual, spiritual destruction of Europeans global consciousness. If spirit is found most visibly in the ideal, it was in the progressive rationalism, nominally French originated, nominally American actuated, that modern innovations of thought about ourselves began an absolute technification. Concepts and theories became more sophisticated and through a combination of arrogance, ideology, and foreign manipulation were made almost religious, undermining and destroying all old ways within this self-hating new one. Thus before Europeans ever started fighting each other, right as they were demographically seizing the entire planet, their soul and spirit died. They lost Christ, and soon after they lost their own will. Their identity in new world and old deracinated.

It is “upon the ruins” of the Old World that the New World asserts itself. Nevertheless, never will the new reach those former heights, if it fails to restore its architecture. A perverse process has occurred in America, where parochial identity with the state-centered technical definition of ‘America’ has destroyed any perspective to what it actually means to be American – as a historical, spiritual and physical reality. Without referential orientation, ‘America’ according to what is increasingly a completely superfluous official definition, is a void identity. As it pushes ahead alone, those ruins beneath it will simply remain stone. Identity, a so fundamental political spirit for the people, the state and for any prospect of order beyond, is something the state itself cannot conjure arbitrarily.

A point which has already been outlined in The Nomos of the Earth, but which is so absolute to understanding the current situation is that of the American revolutionization of European legal and by consequence statal formality for its own power-political benefit. It is legality for its own sake, without reference to the real. This involved the recognition of Japan into international law on equal footing with Europeans prior to the World Wars. It involved the universalistic claims the United States used to justify its behavior, to assist in the physical destruction of Europe, in the two World Wars. With Europe destroyed, what was once simply shown in juridic universalism fully showed itself in the foreign policy of a now dominant United States. Our state showed no hesitation to dismember the British and French empires to appeal to non-Europeans for short-term geopolitical expedience. Our intelligence agencies and mass-cultural complex, by intention or accident, happily sterilized the cultural fabric of Western Europe, especially Germany, through the ‘Americanism’ promoting mass-media and entertainment – artificial mediums of derivative ‘culture’. Which if we are to remember that culture is the spirit of a people, such action was a form of genocide.

When the European states first saw the United States decoupling from their order and pursuing its own way absolutely, they should have panicked. Well, they did in a way. Central Europe’s reactionary posture in the first World War and then meta-modern existentialism in the Second demonstrated a defense of their old ways developed into a full-fledged hostility towards Eastern Bolshevism and Western depoliticization. It was a vain attempt to reassert the collapsed global European nomos by force. This failed and its failure facilitated the eastern half of the continent to be eaten by an Eastern possessed superpower, and the western half to be occupied by a technologically deracinated superpower pushing anti-spirit. How ironic that the French and British received a mutilated victory that rendered their condition not too far from that of Italy and Germany as powers. I doubt the Americans behaved at large with anti-European sentiments like that of the Bolsheviks, but the disregard for being European officially facilitated a foreign policy just as if not more destructive. Just as Communism destroyed European Russians before Eastern Europeans, so too did Capitalistic universalism for European Americans before Western Europeans. Thus Continentals are not the only casualties as those peripheral Europeans were spiritually slaughtered first. The alien forces march in from the East, the insanities of our own pride march in from the West, slowly but surely the still alive European is boxed in until even Danzig and Salzburg become indistinguishable from Inglewood or Chelyabinsk.

The war is against two distinct enemy spirits, a third one, in both, very real but unmentionable. All of which are powered from the underworld. To understand their distinction is to know how specifically to tackle them as problems. To understand that they are insanities: “they first make mad…those whom the gods wish to destroy.” Only by realizing they are all satanic forces, and therefore to fanatically embrace Christ, will the European be able to defeat all three – totally.

Where European states will reward political forces that unify their peoples and create an environment of general hostility to foreigners, which therefore assists the security apparatus in protecting itself from general threats tangentially presenting, a continued universalist United States will have the opposite incentive. It will continue rewarding the induction of foreigners for many large pet communities of people in order to be able to diplomatically appeal to feasibly any nation for immediate geopolitical expedience. The United States’ tacit unipolarity and fortress protection from foreign powers geographically allows it to do this whereas European states literally cannot afford to do this, as power-systems, because large contingents of alien hostiles are on their immediate telluric frontiers: Africa, the Middle East and Russia (insofar as Russia is hostile to Europe). The completed universalist America will neurotically pursue global order without any real orientational justification for it. It will claim universal principles and appeal to all nations, but because these are decoupled ideations and not actual, physical, historical forms to claims, they will continuously fall flat. The result will not be the pipedream of a Star Trekian federation, but a powerful United States that will continue to stand in the way of a elementally based global system until it itself falls into political degeneration alike the Roman Empire collapsing when realized all it was anymore was just governing bureaucracy. What took the place of that single empire were many different kingdoms and peoples, although not nearly as severe in respective enmity as the many already fighting groups within North America today.

Furthermore, the hostile dialectic between Europe and Russia will accelerate horribly without the moderating distance of an involved and remedial America. The Russian people are not absolutely alien to the Germanics, Latins, French and British. They are distant and may be typologized as peripherally European in many ways, but they are for the most part European, especially historically. To consider them in the same camp of alienness as Berber, Semite or Kazakh is just absurd. To continue to push them away in such a claim will further their Mongrelization and power-political support of Asian powers hostile to Europeans; that greater historical dialectic of East versus West which due to technology is coming to more and more of a close. If the Europeans are to ever have a global foothold again, they must have Russia not only as a power, but as a force projecting south and east into central Asia, within their bracket. Russia may always remain weird and ‘over there,’ but they have to be respected. Only America will ever be able to facilitate this rapprochement. Given the already existent kinetic hostility, ideological difference, and Russia’s creeping incorporation into the East macro-culturally, the enmity dialectic between them and the Europeans will only increase if they are left to their own natural course. The Russian people were enslaved to hate Europe by the Bolsheviks, now historical circumstance still seems to keep them estranged from their common ethnic family to their West.

Due to the rising threats of Eurasia against Europe, the powers of that Continent will continue to mobilize according to a security imperative which will not only balloon their security sectors but incentivize their states to reward nationalists insofar as they reinforce popular national security. This process does not exist in a relatively safe and ‘unipolar’ United States, a state which can feasibly afford to ignore the existential-spiritual demands of its People. If the Europeans go this direction alone, it is very likely they will go the way of Napoleon and Hitler again, especially with the existence of a resurrected Russia, and far more industrially impressive list of Asian powers. That just assumes the United States sits out, a future absolutely multiracial, atheistic and technicist United States could surely be brought into an anti-European coalition in a late 21^st century World War. At a certain point one must realize that even if the ‘American’ state benefits from Europe’s disbenefit, no European-American should appreciate the long run genocidal possibilities implied against their immediate, pre-statal, existence as ethnic humans. Only if the Americans actively side with the Europeans will the fate of Europe have a chance.

An Order is a full-fledged nomothetic state, otherwise it is just a coalition. The difference is of temporal and existential scale. Orders last beyond current generations for their basis is in elemental form, biologically and spiritually common amongst the successors; not ideas, conditions or incentive-dymanics of the time. The future of the world will either be elemental disorder of many different alien blocs, or the elemental hegemony of our one great bloc. It will not be abstract-based normativity. If one looks at pictures of his ancestors and likely has no clue what specific problems of the time motivated them, but one surely knows what it means to be White, or to be Catholic, or to be from the same community, or talk the same way – that is the common bond through time understood at the individual level. It is the same concept in the macro. Thus building ‘orders’ merely on zeitgeist dependent ideological notions, or mid-run interests alone, is nonsensical if one expects anything significant to come from it. That is order without orientation, it doesn’t last for its basis is fluid, it is not a genuine phenomenal condition representative of some higher form of being, just ephemeral notion. This is why the American ‘New World Order’ of 1990s unipolarity so quickly collapsed. It had no genuine reason to exist for its existential basis was only idea and sheer force, not the phenomena behind the highest form of the political, which actually creates nomothetic amity between otherwise divided states. Today, just as then, there is no New World Order, it is a fantasy. There is just degeneration since the War. The only ever global order was a European one, and if it is to ever reappear, even if by America, it must be that.

Phantoms.

'“They are indeed not dangerous. They never go to the roots of the evil: they all still think that with forbearance, with humanity, with accommodation they can fight a battle which has not its equal in this world.”

Systems of control find their most pernicious manipulation of us in their false appeals to our instinctive desire for the authentic. The more complex these regimes of ‘appeal’ become, the more impressively macabre. The heuristic for us to remember is that in this total age only a total reassertion of the political is acceptable, anything short of this is always suspect.

There is a prospect that the United States government is wizening up to the above as evidenced by its abandonment of the more aggressive strains of global universalism, in particular liberal NGO’s, and its hodge-podge creation of ‘civilizational’ foreign policy doctrine. Everything ‘grand strategic’ the US is currently pushing out needs to be viewed with extreme skepticism however. This ‘new doctrine’ may very well be transitional to the full and real thing, or it may be a front where the systematic-state is recognizing incoherence and seeking ad hoc surface level solutions for the purposes of stability. Europeans are called to be part of a “Western Order’ without any clear definition of what that means beneath homages to the Enlightenment or suffixed-Christianity. Can’t be the Romans though, or the British Empire; can’t be Napoleon or Goethe or Frederick. Can’t be genuine reference to the actually European Christian peoples of that place who hold something actually in common with the European Christian peoples of this place. Insult to injury it doesn’t even allow the European a clear right to claim any position in this. It still reverts to ontological-universalism of some kind. Vague, undefined, and not sufficiently radically true notions of greater purpose are phantom teleology’s: they reference the unreal and claim to be real.

So long as we exist later stage modernity, in the era of the total state and its continual developments, we must be skeptical of any and all statal appeals to us unless it is the full and absolute appeal by a fanatically authentic sovereign whose single and explicit raison d’etre is for our protection and advocacy. Half measures of political form will result in half measures of political outcome, when the odds of the technostructure stack against the needs of the natural.

This civilization-ism must be taken as an infuriating invitation to push conceptually further, but not as any sign of progress.

To “need civilizational allies in Europe” may be deciphered as follows:

1. to need is to require not to love

2. it is for the ‘civilization[al]’ Washington defines, not what Europe objectively is

3. It is is for allies, a coalition, a fading pseudo-order, just utility for Washington’s power

4. it is in, not of, for those who chose to side with us, not the whole and entire unity of us all

5. it is Europe, over there, not as a place we consider here

The whole proposition oozes with transactional baggage. It is an insult disguised as a compliment. Valuing shared interest of the immediate over shared being of the eternal is indicative of a weak political bond.

Maybe not their intention, but the obtuseness of this half-way measure to sanity is insulting to our intelligence. It will never suffice, presenting only a limited but dangerously wanting sign of transitory progress. Perhaps the geniuses who wrote this, who are jumping up and down to be fed scraps, will institute a ‘Council of State’ and believe they are to then instill a counter-revolution with their policy memos and outreach initiatives. No intra-systematic tactic will ever complete their desired ‘self-containment’ alone. Only a full-fledged revitalization of the People, and their Movement onto the State, will do anything. Something not state-technical, but radically political: exoterically existential, and appropriately spiritual. Functionally speaking, this means mobilization and revitalization of all the indirect and direct contingents of society, economy and state towards this unified active form.

On a darker side, this and many other propositions of similar ‘Western’ or ‘American’ civilizational-ism are creating the dressing for a raw Pax Americana: the imperial subordination of as many states into the immediate American sphere, regardless of substance, and in spite of building a nomothetic order where other European states exist in tandem, not dominated subordination, as we enter multipolarity. It only reinforces the parochialism of the systematic interest of the current American-state, not what is best for it and its compatriot peoples in the long run.

It proves to be a reflection of how absolutely unserious our country still is on matters of culture, history and identity. How our state is nothing of the sort beyond mere mechanism and tacit appeal. A state which laments the full and passionate political responsibility. No struggle for there is no movement in it, no basis for it is ever distant from the people. Not any people, not a definition-less mass of the dominated. The American People. This European group and her state hold the responsibility to protect all Europeans and lead the World.

The political is not simply a conditional, but a theologically and naturally influenced phenomenon that is a particular reflection of the broader spirit which moves all groups in humanity. Ignorance of the political is avoidance of the collective, a form that is not simply the aggregate of subjectivity, but an objective spirit of its own with integral consequences on the individual’s spirit. Life at high form feeds into life at low which nourishes in turn and is only ordered from the Highest above. Authenticity, therefore, is of the utmost importance for the sanity of groups. Without the full-fledged recognition of the characteristic real, there is no basis for a true state. Without that there is no genuine possibility for an Order, an entity just as spiritual and political as the state, simply at a higher more distant plane. There is no escape from perpetual nothingness, politically, both at home and across the Earth if all we do is continually entertain parochial half-measures masquerading as truth when we know it represents anything but who we actually are.

To Lead a Planet.

“Nature does not know extinction; all it knows is transformation. Everything science has taught me, and continues to teach me, strengthens my belief in the continuity of our spiritual existence after death.”

WERNHER VON BRAUN

Before all technical questions is the spiritual one. Before today there is yesterday. After it all goes there is only the Absolute. The closer our concern with the fundamental the higher our tasks, the closer to God we find ourselves. Curiously a paradoxical point finds us when we become the most spiritually entranced - idolatry and possession, even of our good natural being, threatens to blind us from God Himself. We risk this gravest danger but have no choice, for the alternative is a complete and whittled pointlessness.

Only on the basis of a common European identity, an integrated order encompassing the US and Europe, as well as integrating Russia as a partner, must be established for the long term survival of every European people. To produce a coalition capable of common outward force projection on the Global South and Far-East, but further an overarching order that can unify global history. No ideology, no normative order (always dependent on a single power-hegemon), no pipedream of multicultural cooperative globalism, is possible to be the basis for a genuine order. A true order is a nomos: a condition of order and orientation contingent on its basis in the generally understood objective real. Such a true order, like a true state, requires this nomothetic basis for cooperation to be feasible between parties. The greater the organically-based-amity, the higher the tolerance groups will have for sacrificing their immediate self-interest. This ultimately requires a common substance between groups if they are to reach such a condition. The same forces which keep the nomothetic state within balance internally in the sense of the political completely, to a lesser but still crucial degree applies here internationally. For any existential insurance into the future, an international system must be based on elemental factors that extend an equal if not further distance into the past.

The only reason any semblance of global order has been possible of late is due to the latent unipolarity of the United States. Such power-political-hegemony that can check Iran or conduct regime change across an entire region, broker peace between India/Pakistan, possibly negotiate settlement in Ukraine, hold bases and fleets virtually everywhere - all of that stabilizing force is fading, fast. Globally, the future is far more chaotic without the constant regulation of the United States, especially with highly alien industrialized states all crunched next to each other across broader Afro-Eurasia.

All fundamentally European powers have a vested long term interest to prevent the demographic, industrial and power-political rise of such states in these alien regions, despite providing capital infusion directly to them. It is absolutely vital Europeans at-large shift from this charity and cooperate with each-other as a priority, economically and technologically. American unilateral support of India, Israel and Japan vis a vis Russia/Europe; European rapprochement and economic subordination with China versus America/Russia, Russian cooperation with China, India, Iran, Israel, the Third World broadly as an ideologically developed 'anti-European' traditionalist Eurasians. All of these behaviors, with trends applicable to all major (three) European blocs, ultimately undermine their shared long term position. Whether intentional or not, it is the non-European world executing successful divide and conquer on the greater-European.

One may question this common European political form claimed, but one must remember that the concept of the political is precedent on the existence of any 'actors' in the international system, and what determines 'the political,' before even the enemy, is a conception of friend – requiring an understanding of the forces of amity. At the global, world-historic level, this is informed principally by elemental obvious truths – like race and religion – despite being interfered with by the enframing of modern technological-power systems and their projections of ideational chaff. Hyper-obsession on current modern forms of political organization, the surface crust of what officially is, rejects this thesis entirely. It apotheosizes the immediate form of government and society as a 'black box' to which the substance within is irrelevant, and the likes of Huntington "are proven wrong by the data" to the prima ultima of sheer present-existing regime power. Such a view of course is blind to history, where hard-factors must be relegated "conditional" not determinative explanation. Nicholas Spykmann outlined that "common sense warns that correlations found by means of such abstraction can by themselves only be partial, not complete, explanations of concrete historical situations." Thus with regard to higher historical forms, informed by more elemental human phenomena, we see a logical relationship that fuels history in a way abstract or ideological analysis alone can never see.

Where Realists of the past used to respect this, and incorporate all of the factors - ie the elemental, obvious and instinctual-identitarian into their theories - those of today dismiss or ignore them. It all becomes a science of the what and no why, and becomes far less useful as a result: intellectually obtuse. Spirit is required for proper mental vision, not just intelligence and clever schemes. When all we have is reason and reason alone, our minds – like the systems of state and economy or the computer – have no reference to the truly important. No soul. Before one throws the neutrality of the scientific method against this, realize that the study of humans is not the same as mathematics, it becomes absurd if pursued without perspective. The modern realist science alone can inform what a state should logically (another form of mathematics) do to maintain itself, but only as itself right now, abstractly conceptualized. If its form is absolutely horrendous such realism is blind and dismisses it. It is an appropriate science when this is understood and such rational analysis is deliberately delimited, but inappropriate when weaponized by a technicist state, its systems and obfuscating ideology - academic ideologies like rationalism or absolutized criticality. The American pivot against China is logical, but when brought to the forefront of our political concern it is laughable. Far more dangerous to us politically is our own internal dissolution and our own facilitation of foreign threats than those foreign threats themselves. Whose to say India isn’t next? This governing elite created the China we face today out of its own incompetence, negligence and self-fulfilling narcissism. Now it is moving carrier fleets and non-strategic nuclear weapons against it, and spooling up the Pentagon to recruit you to die for their security. The very reason we are in this situation is because of the decoupled apoliticism of the American ‘state’ that does whatever it wants when it wants to no benefit for the people – Iraq, Serbia, anti-Russian agitation, unconditional support of Israel, support of China in the past, tolerance for sovereign interference by various lobbies from Qatar to Apple – because it is essentially a geopolitical whorehouse. This is not a state, it is a system, a bazaar, and therefore it can not legitimately expect its people to sacrifice for it when it has failed its most fundamental task: the protection of the people, totally; meaning their empowered embodiment in sovereign statal form.

Where the state determines the identity of its people without reference to objective historical baseline made explicit, the state is not behaving legitimately. This makes patriotism in today’s modernity especially confusing for many. From the people there is much genuine authenticity in it, but since it is ultimately at the behest of the power-structure what ‘patriotism’ is – be it a multiracial F-150 commercial with American flags or a transsexual general staff officer – ‘patriotism’ can never today be relied upon as substitute for our identity. Our identity precedes our governing authority and the techno-economic power complex. Our identity is based upon who we naturally are, more specific to us as persons at the individual level, but clearly recognizable according to characteristics across large groups that share them as a common baseline. Ungrounded identities adopted are projections of power-systems and thus are not ontologically legitimate. This inauthenticity is always proven in time, for a mass-schizophrenia ensues. Unfortunately this realization is often muddied in the present, it seems this is changing though.

For the unsympathetic reader, understand that all uni-rational-technical geopolitical strategy – economic and power-political – is only valuable on its own within a century, perhaps less, for any single interest. There is no guarantee to security let alone any civilizational telos from divisionally supporting alien powers, even if switched every few decades. This is what makes it so clearly not grand strategy - for grand strategy looks for security beyond what is even intermediately clear. In the long run, such strategy only makes them cumulatively more powerful, placing all of them in a long run position to project overwhelming antipathy against us. If Germany or Russia became more of peer-competitors in the post 2100 world, that would be markedly existentially superior to China, India or Israel, for the latter are alien peoples. Like peoples can at minimum be expected to possibly cooperate at a civilizational scale at an undefined point in the future where power distribution is unknown, for from their position it is politically expedient to allow a loosely nomothetic structure, with internal hegemon(s), as opposed to sheer domination. Since such nomothesis is impossible with aliens, alien powers will naturally seek subjugation or even elimination if possible. From the position of alien powers in such a future, especially within the context of general non-European post-colonialist rage, this is conceivable and thus it is guaranteed that we would totally lose our historical destiny and liberty to groups far less moral and forgiving than we were to them.

America is in the situation where in order to truncate its own decline, it must support the rise of other powers. This will necessarily mean allotting them more and more say as the relative power dynamic becomes closer. This will require finding ground with the Russians for a cool cooperative condition. Even further, the restoration of Germany and techno-industrial re-consolidation of Europe around it is the greatest grand strategic opportunity of the 21st century. Never-mind if this creates a future competitor when the alternatives are alien competitors with no strong more likely friends. Like a hydrogen bond, different states so ontologically alike can not simply cooperate but overlap into outright common loyalty. Enmity and amity correlate with the margin for possible political cooperative form.

This is why in the face of such significant rising external powers, any enmity that exists within our broader European bracket, between potential-hegemons, is superfluous in the face of an overarching common series of enemies with far more intense real enmity; precisely because their amity is far more distant. They constitute existential threats that we ourselves do not to each other. Political amity which is real is based on objective human phenomena: race, religion, culture and all of their exponents. The sooner all powers realize this and form an integrated coalition to eventual order to hopefully even single super-political form, the better suited we are to escaping this closing window from complete historical annihilation.

For right now distinctions between (White)-Californian, Norman and Kalugan, although significant in their own right, are nothing if we are all submerged within a common and imminent rising tide. A tide which targets us all curiously, almost because from the anti-colonial perspective of the other, we are all 'White.' Are we to forget that just because we abandoned our historical mission of global conquest we never ceased to be a colonial people? Whether we triumph or die, we will always be global appropriators: better we embrace this, for it is how they will always see us. We may as well, at least, hold a spirit capable of defending ourselves.

This is about far more than simply American grand strategy. When it is understood that we don't exist in the times of Metternich anymore, consideration of grand strategy at the national level alone is offensively asinine. We are not China, we are not Israel, we are neither India nor Japan - all closed-circuit civilizational states. Our grand, meaning greater, civilizational telos is not limited to our national borders like them. For we are an extension of an already existing people that developed on the North-European plain, as are all other colonial Europeans. There are heartland Europeans, which we just call just that, and then there are colonial Europeans. America is not absolutely unique, and completely intertwined in all human-factors with the other European peoples for its own authentic identity. Just because our recent histories and administrations are different doesn't change that we are the same people. How absolutely repulsed this makes one to the past 80 years of fake ideological-'political' distinctions. How imperative we then realize that we reunify our consciousness over a very diverse but in the grand scheme very common People.

Thus the integrated-order will not be one of a single power over all others, but of regional partnerships within a common bracket. Of course cultural revitalization, reassertion of Christianity and the abandonment of current failed methods of 'state' (if you can even really genuinely call what we have 'states'), economy and society are cross-internally prerequisite.

Given that the eternal trumps the immediate, the elemental the more rational mechanistic imperatives of trade and power-political balancing, it is paramount to recognize and formalize our perennialism to achieve geospatial to world-historical orientation. This is the foundational baseline not only for a common defense, but for a greater direction, vision and even destiny to break us out of an otherwise very dark future of more intensely antipathetic never-ending competition and war. This is about closing the entire circuit, not simply adopting one short term parochial historically obtuse national-strategy for the next - be it a few trillion in passive investment to China these decades, oh they're a problem so now a few trillion to India instead. No century where we just go back and forth, with idiotic hubris, until both eventually wizen up and come to strangle us.

None of this is to even mention our completely horrendous internal, techno-societal and demographic policies; our complete ignorance of culture; our subservience to neutralizing systems. In this sense blind hawkishness is not the suggestion here, so do not be confused. Even those powers alien to us are not to be treated with blind technically determinative hawkishness. Such an attitude is the product not of anything human, but out of the demands of self-referential systems of power. We are existentialists, not power-glorifiers, and thus reject such technicist or special-interested intrusions masquerading as patriotic strength.

The imperative stressed is about things we have complete control over: our associations, our states, societies and economies. It is for the defense of our peoples existence, the morality of our true faith, and our consequent global mission.

We need not defeat these rising powers inasmuch as we just need to stop feeding them; and stop killing ourselves. Until the United States, and the entire Western world reform their societies, techno-economies and governments to revitalize and make principal our people, culture and Faith. "[Any] single-minded focus on foreign policy [is] an exercise in futility." This may be extended metapolitically to suggesting that any single minded policy focus is an exercise in futility. Our Being, Becoming and Absolution, are all prerequisite to any fruitful Global Order. This takes the form as our collective being, in ourselves spiritually but formally politically, in our complete and absolute state. Motivation towards the Good itself, not just ourselves, for eachother in accordance to the Creator is required, for this is ultimately a moral-hyperphysical undertaking for all of us regardless of proximity to technical impact. God is with us only works if God is with us.

The necessary completion of telos is only possible if built upon a concrete political nomos, not abstraction. Furthermore, the political is not simply antipathy, or even itself, but fundamentally informed by the elemental; the spiritual. The literal realities of the spiritual, not their moral-logical frameworks, do have an actual influence on historical reality. The aforementioned metaphysical tripartite is the essence of political nomos, be it at local-communal or global-ordered scale, it is the same spiritual object form of a People. From which there is orientation to order, and thus the basis for a teleologically complete political, and thus strategic, disposition.

Since no grand strategy short of a global one is complete, even if it fails to realize its ultimate practical desires, its existence matters in the existence of a real order and orientation towards a genuinely striving finality. It currently is nothing of the sort; just RAND reports and INDOPACOM briefs; the technical without purpose beyond itself. Until that is realized by our respective 'states,' elites and complexes, by the entire totality of our peoples either in aggregate, or their collectively realized spiritual totality at some Providential future point of catharsis, will we ever regain any semblance of historical agency.

What this will look like is to be framed in future pieces. In short however, the following process must occur, in the following order:

0. The complete Christian, cultural, demographic and sovereign restoration of the European peoples - most importantly the American - as they exist as nations within their respective states. I.e. the re-nomothetization of European states.*

1. The creation of a formal system, both official and actual, of European states that codify their bracketed position with each other as distinct and legally higher than other states. A formal end to absolute international legal universalism.

2. The exclusive cooperation and support, technologically and economically, between powers internal to the new bracket, that supersedes competition insofar as greater threats exist beyond this order. To contextualize this means the end of hostile trade relations between America and Europe.

3. The gradual establishment of a soft imperial structure between Washington, Berlin and Moscow with the express aim of collectively pursuing global hegemony: this time not as consequence of our preeminence, but as a deliberated political ambition. This is a light political unification, a soft superstate, and the only way to prevent the bizarre consequences of Westphalian pluralism. In the total age total solutions are mandatory if we are to have historical agency. Trampling of unique nations within this structure is not acceptable and limited sovereignty, even state form, is required for particular national vitalities to prosper. The same applies to attempting this structure without the completion of 0. and 1.

4. The complete moral-spiritual reassertion of the Church from San Francisco to Vladivostok, save for some ecumenical distinctions, and globally for all peoples as a reinitiation of European Christendom’s original evangelical mission.

5. The consolidation of top-level technological-industry under particularly American innovative and German managerial talent as part of a supernational concern for the acceleration and expansion of Mankind both spatially and in capability. Neither private investment alone nor entitlement based political systems cannot achieve true Progression. There must be will coordinate under a single sovereign; a political-spiritual and not fundamentally technologically solvable problem. An activated historical people with total states and a total world Order can bring us to the future – fast.

*This is a rolling process that does not necessarily require completion for the other steps to start, but must be completed for the others to complete.

There is no global order without a global people - there is only the imagined, idealized fantasy, of dupes or technocrats. This global people exists and already was asserting itself before the cataclysm from 1914 – 1945, with European outposts at every imaginable corner of the globe. Make no false interpretation. The plight of the non-European is far more brutal without our preeminence. If the European peoples fail there will be no prospect for all of humanity to centralize the Earth politically. This Eurasian coalition will not last after us. Their enmity within is too great (whereas within the European by comparative contrast it clearly is not). The rising great powers of many absolutely hostile peoples taking our place will result in a tragedy of great power politics far more horrifying than that between European cabinets in the 18^th century. It will be one of highly industrialized peoples who are far less sophisticated culturally and far more driven by their instinct – by hatred. The savages now have nuclear weapons.

We either fall into wars of all against all or we accept natural hierarchy, live according to God – meaning Europeans must remain the most humble of all or face fall – and never end our expansion, until the end of time, across the entire universe.

When we have an emperor again, we will know our souls can take some reprieve. We are that Faustian nation, that spirit of Rome, that Katechon so delicately standing between nothing and everything.

Rockets to rockets ahigh.

On the Horizon of the Unveiling.

If God is with us, then who can be against us?

Hatred is the excessive product of love, intense love. When justified, it becomes the most tragic evil. Weakness is no genuine solution to this danger, it is an equally sinful antithesis. They wrap around each other as a satanic dialectic of the passions, prideful sloth fighting prideful wrath. Liberalism apotheosized makes weakness a sacrament, it is no Christianity. Nationalism without bounds is collective wrath, it is no Christianity. If we are to ever, as a people, get beyond our current dilemma, it will of course not be via the continuation of our current spiritual cancer, but likewise we will find no refuge in a violent chemo therapy. Unadulterated hatred, with no qualms, no mercy, is an understandable yet absolutely horrible evil. It must be rejected outright, or we are all to face the wrath of God.

The European Peoples were gifted the greatest genius, artistic creativity, innovative talent, religious to cultural order and orientation. It is no mistake that our fall, cultural, then civilizational, then now domestically racial was macrocosmally precipitated by Nietzsche’s proclamation that “God is dead.” That event began a countdown, where the entire European World Order lost its most fundamental guiding spirit – towards Christ – and began a gradual collapse to now a complete disintegration. As we begin to awake, like the Saxon, we are once again tested by God. If we fail this time, morally, the consequence will completely enshadow 1945.

God did not want us to fail. He did not want us to succumb to a complete and total genocide within our own homelands. Yet he will not give us life if we choose ourselves over Him. If we are to take back our lands and hopefully reacquire the Earth, it will be through Love and only Love. Not stupidity, not glorified weakness, for we must assert ourselves. But not simply identity alone. God gave us the greatest capability as a people, and we are closest to him, but without true faith we may as well be in hell. It is our birthright to lead, not dominate, the entire Earth and all of her peoples – White and Black, Greek and Jew. Those aliens who are Good may even assist us. They will never be us, but with honest recognition of their difference may we may actually begin to love them. We have a choice, to either make the same mistake as lucifer or to temper ourselves so that we may complete that stretch of our right arms up towards the Heavens - to touch His.

This has been an appeal. An appeal to anyone in power who is European, who wish to be Good and defend their power. Be your motivation petty or virtuous the loss of that which you cherish will be the same if this is not fully appreciated.

REALMS. 9.23.2025 AD.